Officers weren’t exempt: Captain Henry Allen of the sloop Rattler was executed for sodomy in 1797, and Lieutenant William Berry was hanged in 1807 for buggering a boy. Merely attempting sodomy might get you “lashed around the fleet” (i.e., taken from ship to ship and whipped on each) and drummed out of the service. That was an extreme case, but average lash counts for morals offenses were often double those for mutiny and desertion. A sailor convicted in 1757 of raping a boy received 500 lashes in 1762 two seamen received 1,000 lashes each for consensual sex. Punishment could be brutal even if you escaped the noose. In 1806 there were more hangings in England for sodomy than for murder. Buggery “comyttid with mankynde or beaste” was first made a capital crime by Henry VIII in 1533 naval buggery was specifically made a hanging offense in 1627.
British naval buggery, however prevalent, was necessarily discreet: sodomy was officially considered a grave offense, and punishment was harsh. Still, Gilbert suggests, common is one thing, brazen is another. There were half a dozen ties that we knew about … To my knowledge, sodomy is a regular thing on ships that go on long cruises.” I have been told that in some services (the Austrian and French, for instance), nobody ever remarks about it, taking such a thing as a natural proceeding: that may be so or not but in any case, nobody was ‘shocked’ on board either the A- or the B. While conceding that “it is impossible to judge the incidence of buggery in the military,” he goes on to quote one British officer as follows: “I have been stationed, as you know, in two or three ships … On the D-, homosexuality was rife, and one could see with his own eyes how it was going on between officers. Gilbert suggests there’s some basis to the belief that the Royal Navy’s traditions consisted of “rum, sodomy, and the lash” (a witticism often misattributed to Winston Churchill). More pertinent to our subject is Arthur Gilbert’s “Buggery and the British Navy, 1700-1861,” Journal of Social History, 1976. As in any environment in which males live in close quarters for extended periods (prison and boarding school are the other well-known venues in this respect), both consensual and nonconsensual homosexual behavior did and doubtless does occur aboard ships - see for example Barry Burg’s Sodomy and the Pirate Tradition (1995), which lends vivid new meaning to such expressions as “shiver me timbers” and “thar she blows.” Sodomy, incidentally, wasn’t clearly defined in English law but at minimum included anal intercourse between men (authorities differed on whether anal sex with a woman counted) and in some interpretations bestiality, necrophilia, and fellatio. That’s not to say sailors spent all their time singing sea chanteys and tying knots. There is an unsubstantiated story that boys in East Indian peg-houses were required to sit on pegs between customers, giving them permanently dilated anuses.” Whatever you say, Bob. Wilson writes: “A ‘peg-boy’ is a young male who prostitutes himself to homosexuals ‘peg-house’, a homosexual brothel. But the earliest usage of peg boy cited in the Oxford English Dictionary is from Playboy’s Book of Forbidden Words by Robert Anton Wilson (1972), perhaps not the most reliable source. I’ve seen peg = “copulate” in a 1902 slang dictionary, and it’s easy to believe the expression was common long before that. Did some British warships routinely put - let’s be blunt - underage male prostitutes on the manifest? Don’t be ridiculous.įirst, terminology. Were ships’ boys sometimes used for sexual purposes by their elders? We have sworn testimony that they were.
Was buggery, if not rampant, at least fairly common in the Royal Navy in its prime? (We’ll define this as the 18th century through WWI.) People certainly thought so at the time. well, I guess we can’t say “get to the bottom of,” can we? “Get a handle on” also has unfortunate implications.